Merchant Account Services

Archive for January, 2007

An Example Of Why Merchants Find It Hard To Get Good Information

Tuesday, January 30th, 2007

While aimless wandering the Internet I stumbled upon a brief article that titled, “Shopping for a Payment Gateway and Merchant Account“. Seemed like another harmless attempt to explain the basics of accepting credit cards over the Internet that reiterated the basics that are pretty available from any website related to the topic.

It started off okay and did a decent job of summarizing the basics. The term “hybrid solutions” was a little odd to read considering that the terms “third party processor”, and to a lesser degree “Internet Payment Provider”, are already very well known names for companies like Paypal that provide the ability to process credit cards through their merchant account. But it wasn’t bad name to use if you didn’t know about the more common names for them.

Then is started to go downhill.

The first piece of information that was disappointing to read was:

If you are setting up a new online business then it is unlikely that your business will have a positive credit history. Under these circumstances it can prove difficult to gain access to a merchant account.

What this basically says is that if your business is new, its lack of credit history may make it difficult to establish a merchant account. While not entirely untrue, it is misleading. While having established business credit is a positive thing, it can be easily overcome in the vast majority of cases. In fact, most merchant accounts are established based on the credit of the owner(s). A bigger factor in preventing a new business from establishing a merchant account is the product they are selling and the environment they are selling it in. A business selling t-shirts in a retail stores is very low risk and would have to go out of their way to prevent a merchant account from being established for them (in other words, it would be really hard to be turned down). However, a business selling high end electronics over the Internet would find credit playing a larger factor due to the increased exposure to fraud and chargebacks they would face due to the nature of their products.

The next section that caught my attention discussed the fees associated with payment gateways:

Unfortunately, fees can be complicated with some accounts. It may be necessary to pay a setup fee, and you will also be required to pay a percentage of any transactions, generally equivalent to between 1.5 percent and 2 percent. A fixed fee per transaction that’s usually less than 50 cents may also be required as well as a monthly management and administration fee, which could be anywhere up to $100.

Different accounts offer different options and your sales figures will determine the right choice for you. If you sell a small number of higher value items then you should try to find a payment gateway that charges a fixed fee. In contrast, if you sell large amounts of items for minimal cost, then you should avoid this fixed fee and concentrate on accounts that offer fees based on a percentage of transactions.

Where do I begin? It seems they have confused the rates associated with a merchant account with that associated with a payment gateway and even then I am not so sure about some of the fees they mentioned. Although there are various payment gateway providers, there is generally a common set of fees charged and the major gateways (Authorize.Net, Verisign) are no exception. When establishing a payment gateway it is typical to encounter a setup fee (although it is not uncommon to have this waived), a monthly fee (typically around $10 – $20), and possibly a flat transaction fee. Payment gateways typically do not take a percentage of your sales. This is typically done by third party processors or hosted ecommerce solutions like Yahoo Stores. The monthly management and administration fee is alien to me. I am assuming that they are referring to an entirely different service and are once again confusing it with the services offered by payment gateways. If you know what they are talking about please comment below.

Payment gateways that do not require a merchant account do generally incur greater costs, because they combine the two required aspects of processing a payment. While some services charge as much as 50 cents per transaction plus a 4 percent to 5 percentfee, PayPal is one of the cheapest available options with a 30-cent and 1.9 percent to 2.9 percent fee on all transactions. With no set-up fee and no gateway fees. this makes PayPal genuine value for money. Similar services like NoChex offer similar rates. Another point worth noting is that services like these do not tend to charge refund fees, monthly or annual fees or regular administration fees.

Individual merchant accounts have similar fees to PayPal but they also generally require a set-up fee and a monthly payment. Ultimately the choice is yours and while PayPal does offer good overall value, it is more difficult to integrate into a Web site despite recent additions to its merchant tools section.

The statements above are mostly fair. But it should be noted that Paypal, while clearly the best third party provider for those it is available, isn’t always the best choice for a merchant. Many factors come into play. Our article Merchant Account Comparison goes into much more detail about that. But it should be noted here that few merchant accounts nowadays require a setup fee. This is usually reserved for very high risk businesses nowadays. Plus, as covered in our article, although true merchant accounts have a monthly fee and most third party processors do not, this does not mean they will cost more or that third party processors are the best option, even not considering integration issues.

What bothered me the most is their conclusion:

For convenience and affordability, hybrid solutions tend to offer the best option. They work out much cheaper because the payments are combined and with competition heating up in this area, things are only likely to improve in the future. PayPal is one of the most widely used of the hybrid solutions because its rates are among the cheapest available.

This is based on the incorrect information we dissected above and poor assumptions. As outlined in the Merchant Account Comparison article there are a lot more factors to be considered and a merchant account can be cheaper then Paypal quite easily.

I applaud the author for trying to offer information to merchants. It clearly was unbiased which is refreshing. Unfortunately it was inaccurate and may only confuse merchants or worse, cause them to make a bad decision for their business.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Major Third Party Processor No Longer Accepts MasterCard

Friday, January 19th, 2007

CCAvenue, one of the larger third party processors, has lost its ability to process MasterCard credit card payments. At least temporarily. Below is the notification they have sent to their merchants:

Dear Merchant,

For over 5 years, CCAvenue has been striving hard to get you the best of payments facilities and technologies that are available. You may be aware that the payments industry is a rapidly evolving one and there are new developments every day. There have been ups and downs and we have handled many challenges together by supporting each other.

One significant development that has occurred a few days ago is that MasterCard International has revised some of its rules and has implemented a program called the MSP (Member Service Provider) Program across all of Asia, Europe and the Middle East. Due to this development, all third party payment processors like CCAvenue in these regions will have to make certain changes in the work processes and meet certain norms before they can continue to accept MasterCard online. As per MasterCards new rules, the acquiring banks are required to stop the MasterCard payment facility to third party payment service providers with immediate effect till they comply with the new requirements.

Under the new MSP Rules, every sub-merchant has to enter into a tripartite agreement between the sub-merchant, the acquiring bank and ourselves. The MasterCard payouts will be done directly by the acquiring bank to the sub-merchants bank account. The sub-merchants website name will be reflected in the card holders statement and not CCAvenue (as it is currently happening). Please note this process is only for MasterCard and CCAvenue will continue to offer all other payment options and there will be no changes in the payout process for these.

Since the implementation of the MSP Program is going to take time, we regret to say that we are compelled to stop offering the MasterCard payment option for a few weeks. Therefore, as of January 15th, 2007 the MasterCard payment option will not be available on our gateway.

We are deeply aware of the loss to your business due to this action and we can’t say enough about how sorry we are for this. Do remember, as we are your partners, it severely affects our business too. We regret to say that this is entirely out of our hands and beyond our control.

On the way forward, our acquiring banks have already initiated the registration process of CCAvenue as a MSP. We assure you that we are trying our best to get the MasterCard payment option live again as soon as possible. However, as per the feedback from our acquiring banks, the process will take at least a few weeks. We have always believed in transparency and I seek your co-operation and support in complying with the new MasterCard Rules and Bye-laws.

What does this mean? If you are a CCAvenue user you no longer can accept MasterCard payments. As MasterCard is the second most popular credit card this can have a serious impact on your business. Assuming they do intend to do what is necessary to become MasterCard compliant again, you should find an alternative form of processing until they can accept MasterCard once more.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

High Assurance SSL Certificates Make Their Debut

Saturday, January 13th, 2007

As previously mention in our blog new high assurance SSL certificates have made their debut. If you visit Entrust’s home page in Internet Explorer 7 you will see the address bar turn green.

As mention in our original blog post these new SSL certificates will be expensive. Entrust sells theirs for $99. Verisign is offering packages that start at $1300 per year. Once again, it looks like the small ecommerce shop will be priced out of game.

Technorati Tags: ,

Authorize.Net to Offer Recurring Billing API

Thursday, January 4th, 2007

Authorize.Net will begin beta testing a new API for their recurring billing service. Currently users of this feature had to either manually configure recurring billing accounts or upload a file containing multiple accounts.

This API is slated to go live by the end of the month. We have been asked to be beta testers of this new feature. Expect a review and an article with code to follow.

Technorati Tags: ,